does newer mean better???

zahranlightning Moderator on August 8th, 2006 / post 8723
do u honestly think armin was better in the old days ...i cant belive it armin is at he's peak right now
dacarmalightning pwr on August 8th, 2006 / post 8724
Clumbsy wrote:
Newer doesn't mean better...... who told u sooo?
:no: :no: newer is something new but it doesnt mean its better
Steve Lawler used to play much better than nw,
Sasha, Digweed, and much more ....


hey clumbsy whats up,no one told me newer is better,im just sayin some people think like that.i dont!
and yeah thats what i said about sasha 4 example he use 2 play much better than now,i like his older sets more
dacarmalightning pwr on August 8th, 2006 / post 8725
zahran wrote:
do u honestly think armin was better in the old days ...i cant belive it armin is at he's peak right now



yeah i honestly prefer armins older sets than now zahran,hes not bad now,but he use 2 get the crowd much more hyper before than now
zahranlightning Moderator on August 8th, 2006 / post 8729
omg i cant belive what ur saying
dacarmalightning pwr on August 8th, 2006 / post 8742
zahran wrote:
omg i cant belive what ur saying



:-D  :-D  lol its just a difference in oppinions zahran or different preference in music..and im not saying that he sucks now.hes cool,but use 2 be better before.and ofcourse armin in general is a great dj,hes in the high category.and hes very popular.and thats all :-D ..peace out mate
Clumbsylightning Power User on August 9th, 2006 / post 8776
dacarma wrote:
hey clumbsy whats up,no one told me newer is better,im just sayin some people think like that.i dont! and yeah thats what i said about sasha 4 example he use 2 play much better than now,i like his older sets more

I knw no one told u that newer is better... am just sying my point of view man... "
lucabativip Degenerate on August 9th, 2006 / post 8782
lets put it like this...
if i have to make a top 5 all time ranking, alle 5 sets would be from 2003 or even before that...
Jake, it takes more than sex to make a man happy. You also need money.   (Charlie Harper)
dacarmalightning pwr on August 9th, 2006 / post 8784
lucabati wrote:
lets put it like this...
if i have to make a top 5 all time ranking, alle 5 sets would be from 2003 or even before that...


yeah thats true lucabati,i would pretty much say the same too
davev205lightning airamerica.com on August 9th, 2006 / post 8795
I guess I wold have to say that they are different in many aspects.  New sets sometimes have a great deal of music I have not herd before. However New sets seem to be a great deal alike.  Armin, Tiesto, Schultz, etc. Play a lot of the same stuff. However I would have to say that it varies by genre.  House seems to be varied more.  House has more productions and many more dj's.  Trance has changed a great deal over the last two years.   Myself, I like older trance circa, 2000-2001.  thats not to say newer trance is no good but I like older sets.  I believe in 2000-2001 Tiesto and Armin were playing records more for the reason that they were good productions not simple becuase the crowd got off on them.  For example how many times have you people herd "Air for life" in the last year and a half.  TOO Many. I like to hear varied sets, I like hearing new music, not the same old stuff every day.  So I would have to say it's not new that makes the set better, it the dj's originality in track selection and mixing.   :thumbsup:
Commissarlightning Leopard on August 10th, 2006 / post 8852
sorry, i dont mean any offense, but this question is a kind of lame ... cause there is NO relation between date and quality of music, actually I see that the music get worse everyday except for some rare productions or sets from very few djs ... and it's just like lucabati told, for myself, my top rated sets all around are from 2000-2003
dacarmalightning pwr on August 11th, 2006 / post 8866
Commissar wrote:
sorry, i dont mean any offense, but this question is a kind of lame ... cause there is NO relation between date and quality of music, actually I see that the music get worse everyday except for some rare productions or sets from very few djs ... and it's just like lucabati told, for myself, my top rated sets all around are from 2000-2003



no offense taken.by the way it isnt a lame question.because some people do think like that,they think the newer stuff is better than the old,always,any dj..i dont think like that at all,some djs i prefer their old stuff and some i prefer their newer stuff..and yes ofcourse there is no relation between date and quality of music
Commissarlightning Leopard on August 11th, 2006 / post 8873
yeah i know and people like that dont understand anything :)
dacarmalightning pwr on August 11th, 2006 / post 8878
Commissar wrote:
yeah i know and people like that dont understand anything :)


true,they r very lame
davev205lightning airamerica.com on August 15th, 2006 / post 9063
Commissar wrote:
relation between date and quality of music, actually I see that the music get worse everyday except for some rare productions or sets from very few djs



Then you are saying that you think music is getting worse!  You bassically just said you like old sets more.  So you actually answered his question. :lol:  :lol:


It is hard to get out of time when you speek in a linear fashion "saying music is getting worse everyday"implies new sets are no good.
Commissarlightning Leopard on August 16th, 2006 / post 9095
i gave exceptions too
you cannot post in this forum.
click here to to create a user account to participate in our forum.