WHERE DO PEOPLE REPORT MISTAKES?! chicvalry..., page 2

arnani D-Formation Gue on July 21st, 2007 / post 20536

slash wrote:

arnani wrote:
i dont even know who s chivalry :lol:

why you need to know dead people? :no:

chivalry was a bunch of dudes riding horses with weapons depending on era and coolness, like knights in england in king arthur time and stuff, and thus were mostly rich and mannered or either of them, and cavalier is something relative to chivalry, but in nowadays interpretation of such. :o)

gd gd thnx for the info :-D

sillia keep it tribal on July 23rd, 2007 / post 20581

First of all there's again a mistake.... the correct spelling is CHIVALRY!

Second, I was referring to this meaning of the word:
chiv·al·ry /ˈʃɪvəlri/ , noun
1. The qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women.
2. A manifestation of any of these qualities.

Maybe some of you don't know any of these qualities, but they are still alive in some people's hears.

And third, I ask the moderators to do their job and after they had deleted part of the posts, to delete mine - relevant to the missing ones, too.

Thank you in advance!

P.S. When will the e-browser be fixed? ;-)

All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.

bidona user on July 23rd, 2007 / post 20583

ok ok, first, this is not wiki ;-)

2nd, which posts, we dont know which the relevants are, so post their # and will be done :-)

p.s. [e]browser fix? we suppose soon ;-)

slash ProDanceCulture on July 24th, 2007 / post 20597

bidona wrote:
p.s. [e]browser fix? we suppose soon ;-)

what [e]browser? it will never be completely fixed..

ps. to fair lady: 'chicvalry' is written so on purpose and is supposed to be humorous, like a joke or something. we do what we can here, trying to help everyone, solve problems according to rules, it has nothing to do with knighthood and other brave crops...

sillia keep it tribal on July 24th, 2007 / post 20600

@slash I perfectly understand that is it not a piece of pie to run a site like this. What I felt offended by was the fact that any remark regarding some mistake was either flooded away with bullsh*t or turned into a joke, which show no real interest in improving the site.

@bidona - posts N0 2 and 3. Thank you :)

All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.

slash ProDanceCulture on July 24th, 2007 / post 20601

sillia wrote:
@slash I perfectly understand that is it not a piece of pie to run a site like this. What I felt offended by was the fact that any remark regarding some mistake was either flooded away with bullsh*t or turned into a joke, which show no real interest in improving the site.

that is, because most of reported "bugs" are actually features, and real mistakes do get fixed as soon as bugs are noticed.

sillia keep it tribal on July 24th, 2007 / post 20607

So e-browser reading one dj instead of other is just a feature?

In the future if such a feature is noticed whom do ppl write to providing information about the missing dj? Which of the listed [e]ditors is more likely to add the information on time?
Peace :fun:

All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.

slash ProDanceCulture on July 24th, 2007 / post 20645

sillia wrote:
So e-browser reading one dj instead of other is just a feature?

In the future if such a feature is noticed whom do ppl write to providing information about the missing dj? Which of the listed [e]ditors is more likely to add the information on time?
Peace :fun:

it wasn't one instead of another, it was both of them. missing djs in the ebrowser are not a "bug", they weren't just added yet.

what is "add info on time"?

ps. i've just received a personal message, where one dude tells me his situation about torrent was upped, but it was already here, so then it was removed by staff, and dude cannot upload anymore. alongside with this story, he also mentioned, that "it had to do with the new design, and it wasn't only his own opinion (about the design)". i do realize there are bugs in the system (please, do not mix "missing djs" and "programming CODE mistakes"), but... for example, i didn't change A SINGLE BIT in the e-browser code in last half a year, maybe longer... so how did the new design affect this dude's ability to search for torrents in the "old styled, preserved in original state, version of the e-browser" ????

pps. if you are a smart girl, you'll see the resemblance in these two situations... even that they are completely different...

ppps. for those who cannot see the similarities: i get upset in both situations, as i do hear alot of bad things about myself or my work, but it's the shallowness of the users which is really questioned here... you know...

sillia keep it tribal on July 25th, 2007 / post 20655

Didn't mean anything bad neither about your work not to mention yourself personally. I was not trying to diminish your achievements in any way, just trying to help. But as they said "the road to hell is paved with good intentions" :wink:

I'll try to provide information about djs who are missing if I find such. The question was "on time" because as I see the more downloads are in the first 24 hours since the torrent is uploaded, so it is better if the info is added almost right away.
Here goes my thanks to bidona for a thing he did earlier today. thank you :)
And my apologies to you if you still feel offended by anything I said. I'm sorry :innocent:

:)
...And they lived happily ever after :rolleyes:

P.S. And in all fairness of the question I believe the matter was not whether or not there was information about a certain dj in the e-browser but why does the e-broswser takes up a few thing with a slight difference between them and "thinks" they are the same. For example - didn't find any info about Paulo and then shows the nearest resemblance to Paulo - Paul. If it didn't find any info about Paulo then it shouldn't show anything.

All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.