Rating Sets, page 2

sep08 user on October 13th, 2006 / post 12228

If the rating system was taken more seriously by users then It would be a good indication as to how good the set actually is. Some people will rate a Hernan Set 5/5 everytime just because it's Hernan. the sets should also be rated out of 10 instead of 5. A rating of 5/5 means that the set is neraly perfect, but we dont hear many of those, yet alot of sets on this site are rated 5.

jay johnny bass on October 13th, 2006 / post 12229

sep08 wrote:
If the rating system was taken more seriously by users then It would be a good indication as to how good the set actually is. Some people will rate a Hernan Set 5/5 everytime just because it's Hernan. the sets should also be rated out of 10 instead of 5. A rating of 5/5 means that the set is neraly perfect, but we dont hear many of those, yet alot of sets on this site are rated 5.

My point exactly....

Thanks sep08

mihai2211 deep/dark prog on October 18th, 2006 / post 12518

i agree on harkonnen opinion.i think that the indication of the uploader on torrent comment must be taken more seriously.for example,i made my own scale of value about a set:nice,excelent,great and awsome(i think nobody upload a shit set :lol:

).i don't think that all sets must be great and awsome.even if it's hernan or sasha or digweed.

gumball user on April 8th, 2008 / post 24867

SORRY, WHY I CANT SEE (if they were downloaded or not) THE SETS ANYMORE THAT I VE DOWNLOADED,

AFTER i have rated them ?

AFTER rating, i dont see in "torrents" that i ve downloaded a set already.

i must differ and see it in "torrents" , if not, i have a big chaos.

sorry my english, perhaps some one helps?