Rating Sets

MuscleTech monsteronjuice on September 21st, 2006 / post 11049

and vips

slash ProDanceCulture on September 22nd, 2006 / post 11081

MuscleTech wrote:
and vips :wink:

and me :)

matevone party animal on September 22nd, 2006 / post 11086

slash wrote:
and me :)

don't you want too much lol :lol:

DjMigas Migas on September 23rd, 2006 / post 11131

jay wrote:
i have noticed that many sets are rated (usually 5 out of 5) before the whole set has been downloaded and even listened to by the downloader... this totally defeats the purpose of having a rating system in the first place, it also provides other users with false information about the set, i.e whether it is any good or not... my suggestion is to prevent users rating sets until the whole file has been downloaded by that user... i cant understand why people do this...

anybody have any thoughts on this...

I think some ppl are obcess with that :-)

Try to be more produtive to tribalmixes... dont make a war when she never exist!

Thats my opinion.

Hugs to all

https://www.facebook.com/deejaymigas

jay johnny bass on September 23rd, 2006 / post 11135

DjMigas wrote:

I think some ppl are obcess with that :-)

Try to be more produtive to tribalmixes... dont make a war when she never exist!

Thats my opinion.

Hugs to all

accurate rating of sets IS more productive to tribalmixes... its allows people to be more selective of their downloads and generally increases the quality of the music on the site...

bocaccio11 Open your eyes on October 7th, 2006 / post 11880

Well i feel that if a user is permitted to rate before snatching. Then he or she must know what he is doing or that user wouldn't be allowed to rate it. Usually they already have an opinion of the artist, maybe they'll look at the bitrate or the event maybe. And try to promote that torrent. :-D

Willy84 Bongaz on October 9th, 2006 / post 11955

and some times u can find a set without rating and 23 or more seeders and this set is there for more thaan 2 days so ppl have to rate they have to rate it honestly to make the quality of the muzik is better
and i think u can't rate a set b4 downloading even u r a vip or anything (exept slash) i think because he listens to sets b4 users but i also think it's not prefferd to rate a set without listening it.

Willy84 Bongaz on October 9th, 2006 / post 11956

and also i agree about the delete button in here :-D

dacarma pwr on October 11th, 2006 / post 12067

jay wrote:
accurate rating of sets IS more productive to tribalmixes... its allows people to be more selective of their downloads and generally increases the quality of the music on the site...

i agree with that bigtime...some of the sets are over rated too

bocaccio11 Open your eyes on October 11th, 2006 / post 12071

Willy84 wrote:
and some times u can find a set without rating and 23 or more seeders and this set is there for more thaan 2 days so ppl have to rate they have to rate it honestly to make the quality of the muzik is better
and i think u can't rate a set b4 downloading even u r a vip or anything (exept slash) i think because he listens to sets b4 users but i also think it's not prefferd to rate a set without listening it.

yeah i agree with you bout rating before listening :no:

Harkonnen The Evil One on October 11th, 2006 / post 12137

I think we should remove the rating because:

1. Some of the people rates the mixes just for the sake of rating...
2. Some of the people rates the mixes by friendship...
3. If a download is awesome the uploader specifies it in the description because this it is made for and we can tell looking at the seeders and leechers numbers... So rating is useless!!

sep08 user on October 13th, 2006 / post 12228

If the rating system was taken more seriously by users then It would be a good indication as to how good the set actually is. Some people will rate a Hernan Set 5/5 everytime just because it's Hernan. the sets should also be rated out of 10 instead of 5. A rating of 5/5 means that the set is neraly perfect, but we dont hear many of those, yet alot of sets on this site are rated 5.

jay johnny bass on October 13th, 2006 / post 12229

sep08 wrote:
If the rating system was taken more seriously by users then It would be a good indication as to how good the set actually is. Some people will rate a Hernan Set 5/5 everytime just because it's Hernan. the sets should also be rated out of 10 instead of 5. A rating of 5/5 means that the set is neraly perfect, but we dont hear many of those, yet alot of sets on this site are rated 5.

My point exactly....

Thanks sep08

mihai2211 deep/dark prog on October 18th, 2006 / post 12518

i agree on harkonnen opinion.i think that the indication of the uploader on torrent comment must be taken more seriously.for example,i made my own scale of value about a set:nice,excelent,great and awsome(i think nobody upload a shit set :lol:

).i don't think that all sets must be great and awsome.even if it's hernan or sasha or digweed.

gumball user on April 8th, 2008 / post 24867

SORRY, WHY I CANT SEE (if they were downloaded or not) THE SETS ANYMORE THAT I VE DOWNLOADED,

AFTER i have rated them ?

AFTER rating, i dont see in "torrents" that i ve downloaded a set already.

i must differ and see it in "torrents" , if not, i have a big chaos.

sorry my english, perhaps some one helps?